Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 25.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Med. 2014 Sep 16;69:120–125. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.037

Table 2.

Quitting and brand variant type during prior follow-up interview, 2006–2008, Ontario, Canada.

Quita Baseline (Jan–June 2006)b Follow-up 1 (July–Dec 2006)
Follow-up 2 (Jan–June 2007)
Follow-up 3 (July–Dec 2007)
Follow-up 4 (Jan–June 2008)
Follow-up 5 (July–Dec 2008)
n = 580
n = 487
n = 427
n = 390
n = 326
% (n) % (n) % (n) % (n) % (n)
Regular Yes 2.7 (5) 7.4 (12) 1.2 (2) 8.4 (13) 3.4 (4)
No 97.3 (183) 92.6 (149) 98.8 (169) 91.6 (141) 96.6 (113)
Light Yes 6.6 (26) 6.7 (21) 4.8 (10) 9.5 (14) 4.7 (5)
No 93.4 (366) 93.3 (293) 95.2 (198) 90.5 (133) 95.3 (102)
Light replacement Yes 4.5 (4) 4.9 (5)
No 100 (12) 100 (48) 95.5 (85) 95.1 (97)
P-value 0.024 0.049 0.936 0.068 0.374

Baseline interviews were conducted between January and June 2006. Follow-up 1 interviews were conducted between July and December 2006, follow-up 2 between January and June 2007, follow-up 3 between July and December 2007, follow-up 4 between January and June 2008, and follow-up 5 interviews were conducted between July and December 2008.

a

Quit is a binary variable comparing respondents who were classified as a former smoker to respondents who were current smokers. Participants who reported having quit smoking at one of the follow-ups were not excluded from further follow-ups. Former smokers were defined as those who smoked more than 100 cigarettes in their lifetime but did not smoke a cigarette in the past 6 months (i.e. since the prior follow-up interview).

b

Previous brand type information was not collected because this was the baseline interview.