Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 27;290(3):1592–1606. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.588590

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6.

Field dependence of the PR1E for diC6PI and diC6PI(4,5)P2. A, R1 for the 31P of diC6PI (3 mm) caused by 4.9 μm spin-labeled PTEN; the inset shows the ΔR1 of this phosphodiester from 0.004 to 4 T after subtraction of the profile obtained using nonlabeled PTEN. B, R1 for the 31P resonances of diC6PI(4,5)P2 (3 mm) in the presence of 5.1 μm spin-labeled PTEN: P-1 (●), P-4 (▵), and P-5 (▴). The inset in B shows the R1 profile for 3 mm I(1,4,5)3 in the presence of 4.9 μm spin-labeled PTEN: P-4 (●), P-1 phosphate (○), and P-5 phosphate (□). Note that none of these 31P resonances exhibit the low field rise in R1 indicative of a small molecule-protein complex. Error bars for R1 values (here and in subsequent plots) were obtained from a least squares fit of the ln(intensity) versus time determining R1 at that particular field.