Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 25.
Published in final edited form as: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Feb 1;39(3):E166–E173. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000073

Table 3.

Mean Values and Matching Comparison Results for the Radiographical Parameters of the LIF ± ALIF Cohort and PSF Cohort

Parameters n LIF ± ALIF cohort PSF cohort p–value
Preoperative parameters
Sagital vertical aligment 22 4.9 ± 4.7 5.9 ± 4.3 0.4
Coronal Cobb angle* 30 39° ± 18° 25° ± 15° 0.004
Lumbar lordosis* 33 38° ± 14° 38° ± 16° 1
Pelvic incidence* 33 59° ± 16° 56° ± 15° 0.4
Pelvic tilt* 33 28° ± 11° 27° ± 11° 0.8
Sacral slope* 33 32° ± 12° 29° ± 12° 0.5
Postoperative parameters
Sagital vertical aligment 22 3.8 ± 3.2 6.2 ± 5.7 0.09
Coronal Cobb angle* 30 16° ± 11° 18° ± 15° 0.6
Lumbar lordosis* 33 44° ± 14° 36° ± 15° 0.02
Pelvic incidence* 33 55° ± 13° 54° ± 11° 0.5
Pelvic tilt* 33 22° ± 10° 26° ± 10° 0.08
Sacral slope* 33 33° ± 11° 28° ± 10° 0.03
Change between postoperative and preoperative parameters
Sagital vertical aligment 22 – 1.1 ± 4 0.3 ± 5 0.3
Coronal Cobb angle* 30 – 24° ± 13° – 7° ± 14° <0.0001
Lumbar lordosis* 33 6° ± 16° – 2° ± 12° 0.04
Pelvic incidence* 33 – 4° ± 10° – 2° ± 14° 0.6
Pelvic tilt* 33 – 5° ± 13° – 0.5° ± 9° 0.06
Sacral slope* 33 2° ± 13° – 2° ± 11° 0.3

Values were measured in centimeters and presented as mean ± standard deviation.

*

Values were measured in degrees and presented as mean ± standard deviation.

n value indicates number of matched case–control sets.

LIF ± ALIF cohort: Patients underwent, in addition to posterior fusion constructs, LIF with or without a simultaneous ALIF.

PSF cohort: Patients underwent posterior spine fusion alone (PSF) using instrumentation and bone graft.

P value in boldface indicates a statistical significance.