Table 2.
Author | N a | Year | Approach, n | Morbidity, % | Mortality, % | Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Capussotti [29] | 79 | 2007 | 31 simul | 33 | 0 | Mortality rates are similar in both procedures, so the simultaneous procedure can be performed in carefully selected patients |
48 staged | 56 | 1,3 | ||||
Lyass [25] | 112 | 2001 | 26 simul | 27 | 0 | Because of lower mortality rates and similar OS compared to staged, Simultaneous resection is a safe and efficient procedure for the treatment of resectable SCRLM |
86 staged | 35 | 2.3 | ||||
Bolton [35] | 165 | 2000 | 50 simulb | nr | 17 | The mortality rate is higher if liver resection is combined with colorectal resection. Therefore, patients should have hepatic resection delayed for at least 3 months after colon resection |
115 staged | nr | 1 | ||||
de Haas [42] | 228 | 2010 | 55 simul | 11 | 0 | The simultaneous approach is safe for limited HR |
173 staged | 25 | 0.6 | However, the higher recurrence rate observed in studied patients makes its oncological value and use in clinical practice questionable | |||
Martin RC [33] | 230 | 2009 | 70 simul | 56 | 0 | Morbidity and mortality rates are comparable in both procedures. Therefore, Simultaneous resection is an acceptable option in patients with resectable SCRLM |
160 staged | 55 | 4 | ||||
Martin R [26] | 240 | 2003 | 134 simul | 49 | 2 | Simultaneous resection should be considered a safe option in patients with resectable SCRLM, because it offers reduced morbidity, shorter treatment time, and similar survival outcomes |
106 staged | 67 | 2 | ||||
Reddy [37] | 610 | 2007 | 135 simul | 36 | 1 | Simultaneous resection is safe and should be considered for patients with SCRLM; however, due to higher morbidity compared to staged resection only in those patients whose hepatic tumor burden is amenable to minor liver resection (less than three segments) |
475 staged | 18 | 0.5 | ||||
Nordlinger [34] | 1008 | 1996 | 115 simul | nr | 7 | The mortality rate is increased when a major liver resection is performed simultaneously with the resection of the primary tumor |
893 staged | nr | 2 | ||||
Therefore, this procedure is recommended only if it can be done with a minor liver resection and through the same abdominal incision |
aOnly those studies with N ≥50 were considered in this table.
bLiver resection was carried out simultaneously with or within 3 months of colorectal resection.
HR, hepatic resection; N, total number of patients; n, number of patients treated with simultaneous or staged resection; nr, not reported; SCRLM, simultaneous colorectal liver metastasis; simul, simultaneous resection of the primary tumor and SCRLM.