Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 25.
Published in final edited form as: Nanotoxicology. 2014 Dec;8(8):856–866. doi: 10.3109/17435390.2013.837208

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(A–B) Concentration-specific effect of GNPs on ovarian progesterone (P4) and Star or Cyp11a1 expression. Linear regression models showed that P4 accumulation was positively associated with both (A) Star (n=30 rats, p= 0.003, r2= 0.278, adj. r2= 0.252) and (B) Cyp11a1 (n=30 rats, p<0.001, r2= 0.366, adj r2= 0.344) expression upon exposure of rat ovaries to 1.43×106 particles/mL, independent of time. (C-D) Concentration-specific effects of GNPs on estradiol 17-β (E2) and Hsd3b1 or Cyp17a1 expression. Linear regression models revealed significant positive relationships between E2 accumulation and the expression of either (C) Hsd3b1 (n=24 rats, p= 0.038, r2= 0.181, adj r2= 0.144) or (D) Cyp17a1 (n=23 rats, p= 0.007, r2= 0.301, adj r2= 0.0.268) in response to 1.43×103 or 1.43×109 particles/mL, respectively. Data were pooled for each specified concentration, independent of incubation period. The administered dose (particles/mL; top right) and regression equation (bottom right) associated with each respective analysis are presented.