Table 3. Hierarchical Regression Analyses Predicting Language Ability.
EOWPVT | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Predictor | b | SE B | β | t | ΔF | ΔR2 | |
Step 1 | 4.97* | 0.12 | |||||
| |||||||
IFG L-WA L | 21.76 | 9.76 | 0.35 | 2.23* | |||
| |||||||
Step 2 | 1.28 | 0.06 | |||||
| |||||||
IFG L-WA L | 15.60 | 10.79 | 0.25 | 1.45 | |||
IFG L-IFG R | 10.55 | 8.54 | 0.23 | 1.24 | |||
WA L-WA R | 4.09 | 9.49 | 0.07 | 0.43 | |||
| |||||||
* p <.05 | |||||||
| |||||||
CELF-IV-CL | |||||||
| |||||||
Predictor | b | SE B | β | t | ΔF | ΔR2 | |
| |||||||
Step 1 | 4.83* | 0.12 | |||||
| |||||||
IFG L-WA L | 16.49 | 7.51 | 0.35 | 2.20* | |||
| |||||||
Step 2 | 0.41 | 0.02 | |||||
| |||||||
IFG L-WA L | 13.36 | 8,51 | 0.29 | 1.57 | |||
IFG L-IFG R | 5.76 | 6.77 | 0.17 | 0.85 | |||
WA L-WA R | -4.51 | 7.57 | -0.11 | -0.60 |
p < .05