Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 20;9(1):55–64. doi: 10.1007/s11832-015-0643-2

Table 1.

Comparison of intramedullary nailing versus percutaneous pinning groups

Total, n = 84 PPE, n = 32 PPB, n = 17 IMN, n = 35 p-value
Age, mean ± SD 13.8 (± 2.25) 13.8 (± 2.67) 14.0 (± 1.29) 13.6 (± 2.24) 0.81
Sex (male) 61 (73 %) 26 (81 %) 13 (76 %) 22 (63 %) 0.22
Reduction (open) 36 (43 %) 8 (25 %) 9 (53 %) 19 (54 %) 0.03
Location (physeal) 48(57 %) 24 (75 %) 10 (59 %) 14 (40 %) 0.02
MOI
Fall 18 (21 %) 3 (9 %) 2 (12 %) 13 (37 %) 0.04
Sports 53 (63 %) 24 (75 %) 13 (76 %) 16 (46 %)
MVA 7 (8 %) 4 (13 %) 0 (0 %) 3 (9 %)
Other 6 (7 %) 1(3 %) 2 (12 %) 3 (9 %)
EBL, median (IQR) 20 (2–150) 5 (0–40) 20 (0–100) 40 (6–238) 0.01
Surgical time, mean ± SD 87.4 (± 52.8) 64.2 (± 35.97) 74.4 (± 43.05) 115 (± 58.15) <0.001
Max preoperative angulation, mean ± SD 44.2 (± 17.3) 47.6 (± 16.7) 48.9 (± 18.1) 39.5 (± 16.9) 0.13
Max postoperative angulation, mean ± SD 14.6 (± 12.5) 18.8 (± 15.9) 13.4 (± 8.5) 11.4 (± 9.2) 0.06
Max final angulation, mean ± SD 12.4 (± 10.1) 13.4 (± 10.9) 16 (± 12.2) 9.4 (± 7.1) 0.07

MOI mechanism of injury, MVA motor vehicle accident, EBL estimated blood loss, IQR interquartile range, SD standard deviation, Max maximum, PPE percutaneous pins exposed, PPB percutaneous pins buried, IMN intramedullary nailing