Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 6;220(2):729–743. doi: 10.1007/s00429-013-0680-x

Table 4.

Meta-analysis of reports on the inter-hemispheric patterns of Heschl’s gyri

N Inter-hemispheric gyrification pattern % (N) Global agreement Higher rate of R duplication
L1/R1 L1/R2 L2/R1 L2/R2
Von Economo and Horn (1930) 11 18.2 (2) 54.5 (6) 18.2 (2) 9.1 (1)
Campain and Minckler (1976) 29 10.3 (3) 48.3 (14) 3.5 (1) 37.9 (11)
Musiek and Reeves (1990) 28 17.9 (5) 21.4 (6) 25.0 (7) 35.7 (10)
Rademacher et al. (1993) 9 44.4 (4) 22.2 (2) 33.3 (3) 0
Penhune et al. (1996) 40 65.0 (26) 15.0 (6) 15.0 (6) 5.0 (2)
Wong et al. (2008) 17 23.5 (4) 23.5 (4) 23.5 (4) 29.5 (5)
Tahmasebi et al. (2010) 20 15.0 (3) 30.0 (6) 5.0 (1) 50.0 (10)
Da Costa et al. (2011) 10 20.0 (2) 30.0 (3) 20.0 (2) 30.0 (3)
Sub-total 164 29.9 (49) 28.7 (47) 15.9 (26) 25.5 (42) Κ = 0.12 p = 2.10−2
Range [9, 40] [10.3, 65.0] [15.0, 54.5] [3.5, 33.3] [0, 50.0] p = 0.10
Present study 232 36.2 (84) 27.2 (63) 15.1 (35) 21.5 (50) Κ = 0.15 p = 6.10−3
p = 0.02
Total 396 33.6 (133) 27.8 (110) 15.4 (61) 23.2 (92) Κ = 0.14 p = 2.10−4
p = 0.004

Global agreement between the numbers of left and right HG is assessed by a Kappa test and hemispheric duplication occurrence with a McNemar’s test

L left, R right, Κ kappa