Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 26;6:165. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00165

Table 3.

Partial correlations (controlled for gender, education, and percentage of employment) between character strengths (VIA-IS factors) and coping (SVF120 strategies).

SVF120 Emotional Interpersonal Restraint Intellectual Theological
Sample 1 (mixed sample)
Positive coping strategies (POS) 0.14* 0.11 –0.02 0.38*** 0.16*
Devaluation/defense (POS1) 0.14* 0.08 –0.07 0.28*** 0.00
Distraction (POS2) 0.00 0.02 –0.01 0.28*** 0.22**
Control (POS3) 0.26*** 0.20** 0.03 0.36*** 0.12
Negative coping strategies (NEG) –0.03 –0.25*** 0.03 –0.19** –0.01
Sample 2 (nurses sample)
Positive coping strategies (POS) 0.22** 0.36*** 0.09 0.40*** 0.16*
Devaluation/defense (POS1) 0.12 0.19* 0.09 0.39*** –0.01
Distraction (POS2) 0.07 0.32*** 0.06 0.29*** 0.23**
Control (POS3) 0.36*** 0.32*** 0.08 0.30*** 0.11
Negative coping strategies (NEG) –0.13 –0.26*** 0.16* –0.16* –0.09

NMixed sample = 214 (71 men, 143 women); NNurses = 175 (11 men, 164 women). VIA-IS, Values in Action Inventory of Strengths; SVF120, Stress Coping Inventory. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.