Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 26.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 2013;27(1):47–67. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2012.663917

Table 1.

Background information on species and environmental variables found significant in Poisson regression of each species.

Species/abbreviation Feeding guild Rank of abundance Index of herding Significant variables (abbreviations) in Poisson regression
Elephant bulls (Eb) Mixed feeder 5 5 Woody cover (W)
Giraffe (Gi) Browser 4 3 Herbaceous biomass (B), geology (G)
Impala (Im) Mixed feeder 1 1 Herbaceous biomass (B), distance to river (DR), land system (LS)
Kudu (Ku) Browser 5 3 a
Warthog (WH) Grazer 5 3 a
Waterbuck (WBk) Grazer 5 3 Distance to river (DR)
White Rhino (WR) Grazer 5 4 Herbaceous biomass (B), woody cover (W)
Wildebeest (WiB) Grazer 3 1 Herbaceous biomass (B)
Zebra (Ze) Grazer 2 2 Herbaceous biomass (B)

Notes: Rank of abundance shows the relative abundance of the species based on historical data (1 is most abundant and 5 least). Index of herding shows the degree to which the species groups in herds based on the inter-quartile range of herd size (1 is most prone to herding and 5 is least). Species with comparable abundance (or index of herding) were given the same rank.

a

None of the available environmental variables were significant in Poisson regression.