Table 5.
Hierarchical regression analysis predicting total correct on training session 4; whole sample, N = 76
| ß | t | R 2 | ΔR 2 | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1 | .066 | .066 | .082 | ||
| Age | -.23 | −1.47 | .147 | ||
| Raven’s | .36 | 2.72 | .026 | ||
| Step 2 | .204 | .137 | .001 | ||
| Age | -.22 | -1.50 | .138 | ||
| Raven’s | .25 | 1.63 | .106 | ||
| Session 1 total | .39 | 3.53 | .001 | ||
| Step 3 | .327 | .123 | .003 | ||
| Age | -.36 | −2.50 | .015 | ||
| Raven’s | .15 | 0.96 | .342 | ||
| Session 1 total | .30 | 2.67 | .009 | ||
| Vocabulary | .43 | 3.45 | .001 | ||
| Memory | -.01 | −0.09 | .930 | ||
| Step 4 | .330 | .003 | .559 | ||
| Age | .41 | −2.40 | .019 | ||
| Raven’s | .13 | 0.80 | .426 | ||
| Session 1 total | .31 | 2.71 | .008 | ||
| Vocabulary | .49 | 3.13 | .003 | ||
| Memory | .03 | 0.21 | .833 | ||
| TD vs SLI | -.09 | −0.59 | .559 |