Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 7;8:3. doi: 10.1186/s12920-015-0077-1

Table 1.

Classification agreement between molecular ( f MG) and histologic grades (HG) in training cohorts

Histologic grade
Gene signature Training cohort Total patiens (N) Molecular grade ( f MG) HG1 HG3 HG2
n % n % n %
fGS A NKI2 [16] 206 G1 55 (86) 5 (10) 46 (49)
G3 9 (14) 44 (90) 47 (51)
fGS B KJX64-KJ125 [14] 166 G1 55 (87) 4 (10) 38 (60)
G3 8 (13) 36 (90) 25 (40)
fGS C Uppsala [13] 249 G1 63 (93) 3 (5) 82 (65)
G3 5 (7) 52 (95) 44 (35)
fGS D TVBDX [6] 196 G1 20 (67) 6 (7) 32 (39)
G3 10 (33) 77 (93) 51 (61)

% in bold correspond to specificity (HG1) and sensibility (HG3).