Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 26;10(2):e0112020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112020

Table 3. Vessel Wall Sharpness Scores.

Subj. RCA (Root) RCA (Mid) RCA (Distal) LAD
[Standard Window Score; Manually Derived Window Score] (%) Repeated measurement in next row.
1 0.37; 0.43 ND; 0.36* ND; 0.22* 0.29; 0.30
0.37; 0.43 ND; 0.37* ND; 0.24* 0.30; 0.32
2 0.37; SAME 0.37; 0.42 0.24; 0.30 0.30; SAME
0.33; SAME 0.38; 0.39 0.24; 0.30 0.27; SAME
3 0.34; 0.39 ND; 0.38* ND; 0.31* 0.30; 0.40
0.32; 0.37 ND; 0.39* ND; 0.30* 0.32; 0.42
4 0.37; 0.39 0.31; 0.31 ND; ND 0.42; 0.39
0.31; 0.38 0.28; 0.29 ND; ND 0.40; 0.38
5 0.36; 0.40 ND; 0.44* 0.21; 0.29 0.27; 0.37
0.35; 0.38 ND; 0.42* 0.22; 0.28 0.27; 0.38
6 0.42; SAME 0.45; 0.49 0.29; SAME 0.41; SAME
0.43; SAME 0.44; 0.46 0.30; SAME 0.41; SAME
7 0.28; SAME ND; ND
0.28; SAME ND; ND
8 0.52; SAME 0.41; 0.47 ND; ND 0.42; SAME
0.53; SAME 0.42; 0.49 ND; ND 0.44; SAME

(*)—Vessel was non-descript with the standard, but visualized with the manually window.

(SAME)—The standard window yielded good image quality after visual assessment.

(ND)—Vessel was non-descript.

(—)—Subject 7 exhibited having a small rudimentary right with left-dominance, thus the RCA-mid to distal end was not present. BOLD—reconstructions are shown in Fig. 5.