Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Qual Life Res. 2014 Aug 26;24(5):1043–1055. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0780-y

Table 6.

Examples of data collection challenges concerning scientific quality and interpretation.

Questions of scientific quality, interpretation, and integration of data
  • Missing self-report data due to inability or unwillingness to provide information

  • Missing data in medical records or patients' personal records

  • Conflicting data provided by different sources (patient vs. caregiver) or at different times

  • Different information given by participants to nurses versus physicians versus researchers

  • Different, sometimes conflicting data provided to different research personnel, depending on participant-researcher relationship, race or sex differences

  • Difficulty determining the reason for contradictory information in real-time

  • Difficulty capturing certain contextual data in real-time, such as gestures, tone, smell

  • Potential for biased sampling when clinicians recommend or select patients for participations

  • Participants have hard time remembering events in question or speaking about the research topic, but researchers are not aware of this

  • Analyzing large volumes of qualitative and mixed data to assess data quality and validity in real- time is time consuming

  • Difficulty interpreting whether participants' experience and perceptions align with the group to which they were assigned (e.g., diagnosis category, intervention vs. control condition)