Skip to main content
. 2004 Jul;24(14):6231–6240. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.14.6231-6240.2004

FIG. 7.

FIG. 7.

Response of NTg and RRS6K1 transgenics to a physiological or pathological stimulus. (A) Response to 4 weeks of swimming training (Sw; NTg, n = 6; RRS6K1, n = 8) compared to the non-swim group (Non-sw; NTg, n = 10; RRS6K1, n = 7). (B) Response to aortic banding for 1 week (NTg, n = 5; RRS6K1, n = 5) compared to sham (NTg, n = 6; RRS6K1, n = 5). *, P < 0.05 compared to non-swim or sham of the same genotype; #, P < 0.05 compared to NTg sham or non-swim; ^, P < 0.05 compared to NTg swim.