Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 31;30(1):89–98. doi: 10.1007/s00455-014-9580-3

Table 1.

Spatial variables for neutral, comfortable chin-down, and chin-tuck postures

Neutral Comfortable chin-down Strict chin-tuck
Distance at rest (mm)
 Epiglottic base-posterior wall* 19.70 (3.28)e 19.38 (4.25)f 17.89 (3.26)e,f
 Epiglottic base-arytenoid* 16.36 (5.00)e 15.72 (4.90) 14.03 (4.27)e
 Hyoid bone-vocal cord* 36.92 (6.19)d,e 34.14 (6.73)d,f 30.78 (7.22)e,f
 Chin-posterior wall* 80.66 (7.00)e 80.19 (8.13)f 74.67 (8.22)e,f
Hyoid bone, maximal excursion (mm)
 Vertical 11.43 (4.80) 10.63 (5.21) 12.02 (4.89)
 Horizontal* 12.55 (2.59)e 12.14 (2.99)f 9.64 (3.03)e,f
 2D 14.59 (3.43) 14.29 (3.89) 13.93 (3.92)
Epiglottic base, maximal excursion (mm)
 Vertical* 13.33 (4.48)e 13.43 (4.68)f 15.79 (4.67)e,f
 Horizontal* 10.73 (3.97)d 12.66 (4.52)d 11.61 (3.72)
 2D (Posterior-upward)* 13.26 (4.71)e 14.16 (4.91)f 16.25 (4.38)e,f
Epiglottic flip angle, degrees (°) 111.37 (21.65) 118.55 (22.32) 119.68 (31.31)
Vocal cords, maximal excursion (mm)
 Vertical* 21.13 (5.56)a 18.86 (5.82)a 19.01 (6.18)
 Horizontal* 6.64 (2.13)b,d 4.69 (1.55)d 5.32 (2.61)b
 2D 21.84 (6.28)a,b 19.50 (5.65)a 19.24 (6.83)b

2D two-dimensional

* p < 0.01 using a repeated-measure ANOVA

a,b,cSignificantly different at p < 0.05 by Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparisons

d,e,fSignificantly different at p < 0.01 by Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparisons