Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 3;35(1):125–133. doi: 10.1007/s40846-015-0015-x

Table 3.

Results for OFF/ON and ON/OFF dialysis transitions of 6 h with inverted S I confounders (t = −2 to t = 4, N = 51)

Time t (hr) OFF/ON (N = 51), expect ΔS I < 0 ON/OFF (N = 51), expect ΔS I > 0
QI (%) Q2 (%) Q3 (%) p value ΔS I > 0 % (confounders) Q1 (%) Q2 (%) Q3 (%) p value ΔS I < 0 % (confounders)
−2 −7 1 10 0.9 31 61 −13 −4 3 0.7 32 63
−1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
0 −24 −7 −1 0.3 10 20 −5 1 8 0.9 24 47
1 −45 −14 −2 0.05 7 14 −7 2 15 0.9 23 45
2 −58 −29 −6 0.02 5 10 −13 4 26 0.8 21 41
3 −55 −19 −5 0.03 9 18 −15 9 28 0.7 23 45
4 −46 −22 −5 0.03 6 12 −15 3 31 0.5 24 47

The results show ΔS I quartiles and number of confounders with ΔS I in direction opposite to median trend hypothesized. Q2 = median = 50 % percentiles result. * p values measured using Wilcoxon rank sum tests, Q1 = 25 % percentile, Q3 = 75 % percentile