Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 17;70(1):1–9. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glu009

Table 1.

Testing Two Competing Mortality Models With Human Data

Birth Cohort Gompertz Model (1) Kannisto Model (2) AIC Difference, Δi (2) − (1)
Men
    1890 −212.329 −196.489 15.84
    1891 −211.914 −189.524 22.39
    1892 −218.797 −195.887 22.91
    1893 −221.762 −198.028 23.73
    1894 −219.283 −200.769 18.51
    1895 −232.773 −205.206 27.57
    1896 −241.971 −205.407 36.56
    1897 −221.926 −198.790 23.14
    1898 −237.934 −200.545 37.39
    1899 −213.753 −195.510 18.24
    1900 −221.477 −193.960 27.52
Women
    1890 −212.698 −200.652 12.05
    1891 −213.751 −199.934 13.82
    1892 −222.666 −199.776 22.89
    1893 −219.428 −207.064 12.36
    1894 −218.826 −213.570 5.26
    1895 −232.062 −212.169 19.89
    1896 −236.069 −213.301 22.77
    1897 −225.729 −209.820 15.91
    1898 −231.468 −210.523 20.95
    1899 −216.079 −194.787 21.29
    1900 −209.085 −202.302 6.78

Notes: Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) for the Gompertz model and the “mortality deceleration” Kannisto model. Data on U.S. cohort death rates taken from the Human Mortality Database.