Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb;12(2):184–192. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201406-283OC

Table 3.

Information seeking and communication recommendations

 
Times Reported
  n (%)
Reasons for not seeking more information from the clinician (n = 85)  
 Satisfaction with the information previously provided 24 (28)
 There were other/more important problems to worry about 13 (15)
 My clinician did not inform me about my nodule diagnosis 12 (14)
 My clinician didn’t seem worried about it so I wasn’t 11 (13)
 I had a visit scheduled with my clinician already 10 (12)
 I didn’t think about seeking more information 7 (8)
 I wasn’t worried or concerned about the diagnosis 6 (7)
 I thought my clinician would call 5 (6)
 I assumed my clinician was too busy to answer my questions 4 (5)
 I don’t know how to contact my clinician 3 (4)
 I have had previous experience with my clinician not calling me back 3 (4)
 I was scared of the possible answer 1 (1)
 Other responses 15 (18)
Recommendations for improving communication processes (n = 121)  
 More information about how common nodules are 112 (93)
 More information about what a nodule is 108 (89)
 More discussion regarding patients’ worries and fears 90 (74)
 More information about the risk of lung cancer 85 (70)
 Tell the patient in person about their nodule diagnosis 85 (70)
 Decrease the time interval from imaging study to information about results 78 (66)
 More patient involvement in determining the follow-up interval 72 (60)
 More information about the risks of radiation from planned computed tomography scans 67 (55)
 More information about everything, in letter or phone call (including: how to contact clinician, explanation of follow-up plan, other resources, etc.) 17 (14)
 Ensure clinician is being honest and giving facts 11 (9)
 More interaction with the clinician regarding nodule 11 (9)
 Show pictures of scan and explain image 6 (5)
 Other responses 17 (14)