Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 5;370(1665):20130562. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0562

Table 1.

Accuracy statistics for the dengue models shown in figure 1 with (a) one, (b) five and (c) a maximum of 10 variables. Kappa, kappa index of agreement; %correct, overall correct predictions (%); %PPV, positive predictive value (=consumer's accuracy for presence sites) (%); %NPV, negative predictive value (=consumer's accuracy for pseudo-absence sites) (%); %Flse +ves, false-positive predictions (%); %Flse −ves, false-negative predictions (%); sens., sensitivity; spec., specificity; TSS, true skill statistic; AUC, area under curve (ROC); AICc, corrected Akaike information criterion; nvar, mean number of variables used in models (AICc-dependent); n, total number of models in each series. In brackets after each mean = 1 standard deviation.

no. vars kappa %correct %PPV %NPV %Flse + ves %Flse -ves sens. spec. TSS AUC AICc nvar n
1 0.306 (0.049) 65.30 (2.44) 54.60 (7.78) 75.97 (4.98) 12.07 (2.82) 22.62 (4.39) 0.543 (0.089) 0.754 (0.056) 0.297 (0.105) 0.735 (0.018) 721.2 (17.4) 1 (0) 100
5 0.455 (0.042) 72.73 (2.10) 77.93 (4.28) 68.69 (3.43) 15.93 (1.84) 11.33 (2.13) 0.768 (0.043) 0.678 (0.037) 0.446 (0.057) 0.80 (0.017) 714.9 (36.2) 5 (0) 100
10 0.716 (0.029) 85.78 (1.44) 88.74 (2.18) 84.02 (2.50) 8.43 (1.38) 5.78 (1.15) 0.880 (0.023) 0.827 (0.028) 0.707 (0.036) 0.911 (0.014) 502.5 (51.0) 9.76 (0.64) 100