Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 2;112(7):1983–1988. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1416851112

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

The effect of TMS on the identification of nasal syllables. As the duration of the initial vowel (e) increased (e.g., from mlif, in step 1 to melif, in step 6), people were more likely to identify the stimulus as disyllabic. However, ill-formed monosyllables (e.g., mdif) were misidentified as disyllabic even in step 1, and this effect persisted even under TMS. Error bars are 95% CIs for the difference between the means.