Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 11;115(4):705–716. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu266

Table 1.

Plant and insect parameters affecting fluid retention

(A) Explanatory variables (Dependent variable = insect retention (0/1))
ndf ddf F P
Mixture: estimated covariance = 4·09×10–18 n.s.
FluidOrigin 4 130 50·46 <0·0001
FluidAge(FluidOrigin) 8 130 13·26 <0·0001
InsectType 1 130 108·74 <0·0001
InsectSpecies(InsectType) 2 1294 21·69 <0·0001

(B) Parameter estimates (least square means)
z Value P Estimate s.e.
N. ampullaria vs. Water 0·11 0·9130 0·06117 0·5600
N. ampullaria vs. N. hemsleyana 12·25 <0·0001 9·1181 0·7443
N. ampullaria vs. N. gracilis 4·44 <0·0001 2·0674 0·4658
N. ampullaria vs. N. rafflesiana 12·81 <0·0001 11·3268 0·8843
Water vs. N. hemsleyana 12·52 <0·0001 9·0569 0·7237
Water vs. N. gracilis 4·67 <0·0001 2·0062 0·4296
Water vs. N. rafflesiana 12·99 <0·0001 11·2657 0·8670
N. hemsleyana vs. N. gracilis –11·23 <0·0001 –7·0507 0·6277
N. hemsleyana vs. N. rafflesiana 4·56 <0·0001 2·2087 0·4840
N. gracilis vs. N. rafflesiana 11·74 <0·0001 9·2595 0·7886

(A) Results of a mixed nested logistic regression model testing for the random effect of mixture and the fixed effects of fluid origin (four Nepenthes species and water control), fluid age (young, medium, old), type of insect (fly, ant) and insect species on insect retention rates.

(B) Results of pairwise comparisons of the associated least squares means testing differences in the retention rates between fluids of each species or water.