Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Sex Med. 2011 Aug 11;8(11):3144–3153. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02437.x

Table 2.

Bivariate Regression Models of Saddle Pressures

Saddle Pressures: Perineum
Mean Peak
N Coef. P<0.05 95% C.I. N Coef. P<0.05 95% C.I.
Age 41 −0.38 0.004* −0.63,−0.13 41 −0.74 0.026* −1.38, −0.09
BMI 40 0.63 0.109 −0.15, 1.41 40 −0.19 0.853 −2.20,1.83
Traditional
Saddle
41 −4.98 0.006* −8.41,−1.54 41 −6.64 0.148 −15.74, 2.47
Saddle
Width
41 −0.63 0.704 −3.93,2.68 41 −8.86 0.024* −16.51, −1.20
Hours rode/
week
40 0.149 0.518 −0.31,0.61 40 0.57* 0.316 −0.57,1.71
Miles rode/
week
40 0.023 0.191 −0.01,0.06 40 0.05 0.268 −0.04, 0.13
Saddle Pressures: Total
Mean Peak
N Coef. P<0.05 95% C.I. N Coef. P<0.05 95% C.I.
Age 41 −0.07 0.264 −0.21,0.06 41 −0.51 0.217 −1.34,0.31
BMI 41 0.56 0.003* 0.21,0.91 40 0.67 0.583 −1.78, 3.12
Traditional
saddle
41 −0.57 0.535 −2.40,1.27 41 0.15 0.979 −11.36,11.66
Saddle
Width
41 −2.38 0.002* −3.80, −0.97 41 −11.29 0.019* −20.66, −1.92
Hours rode/
week
39 0.15 0.118 −0.04,0.33 40 1.08 0.117 −0.29,2.45
Miles rode/
week
40 0.01 0.172 <-0.00,0.03 40 0.07 0.217 −0.04, 0.17
*

Model is significant at p <0.05

Analysis excludes outliers