Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cerebellum. 2014 Apr;13(2):248–268. doi: 10.1007/s12311-013-0531-6

Table 5. Details of the first two clinical studies of motor rehabilitation in larger cohorts in degenerative cerebellar disease [6, 7].

Ilg et al. [6, 96] Miyai et al. [7]
Number of patients 16 42
Type of disease SCA6(2), SCA2(1), ADCA(1), IDCA(6), FRDA(3), SANDO(2), SN(1) SCA6(20), ADCA(6), IDCA(16)
Age±SD (range) 61.4±11.2 (44–79) 62.5±8.0 (40–82)
Gender 8 males, 8 females 22 males, 20 females
Duration of disease 12.9±7.8 (3–25 years) 9.8±6.2(7 months–0 years)
Baseline SARA 15.8±4.3 (11–24) 11.3±3.8 (5–21.5)
Control Intra-individual controls for short-term effect Crossover for short-term effect
Intervention 1 h×3 per week× 4 weeks 2 h × 5 +1 h × 2 per week × 4 weeks
Post-training Home training protocols No
Outcome measures SARA, gait speed, balance, BBS, GAS, movement analysis SARA, FIM, gait speed, cadence, FAC, falls
Assessment point 4 weeks pre, baseline, post 0, 8 weeks Baseline, post 0, 4, 12, 24 weeks
Main results SARA and gait improved 8 weeks post-rehabilitation only in patients with cerebellar ataxia not afferent ataxia SARA and gait improved 12 weeks but not 24 weeks

SCA spinocerebellar ataxia, FRDA Friedreich's ataxia, IDCA idiopathic cerebellar ataxia, ADCA autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia, SANDO sensory ataxic neuropathy with dysarthria and ophthalmoparesis caused by mutations in the polymerase gamma gene, SN sensory neuropathy, SARA Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia, BBS Berg Balance score [159], GAS Goal Attainment Scaling [160], FIM Functional Independence Measure [97], FAC Functional Ambulation Categories