Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 20;150(1):209–217. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3303-9

Table 1.

Patient characteristics

n Rate Revised SUVmax
 Age
  58.2 ± 12.7(21–91) 262 3.24 ± 2.64
 Procedure
  Breast conserving surgery 175 66.8 % 2.76 ± 2.10
  Mastectomy 87 33.2 % 4.22 ± 3.28
 Clinical T stage
  T1 187 71.4 % 2.49 ± 1.86
  T2 74 28.2 % 5.10 ± 3.32
  T3 1 0.4 % 6.17
 Clinical N stage
  N0 203 77.5 % 3.11 ± 2.62
  N1 49 18.7 % 3.59 ± 2.61
  N2 7 2.7 % 4.61 ± 3.45
  N3 3 1.1 % 3.72 ± 2.34
 Clinical stage
  I 153 58.4 % 2.35 ± 1.61
  II 99 37.8 % 4.51 ± 3.27
  III 10 3.8 % 4.34 ± 3.06
 Pathology
  Papillotubular carcinoma 42 16.0 % 2.72 ± 2.15
  Solid-tubular carcinoma 46 17.6 % 4.66 ± 3.85
  Scirrhous carcinoma 138 52.7 % 3.14 ± 2.38
  Other ductal carcinoma 21 8.0 % 2.21 ± 1.02
  Lobular carcinoma 10 3.8 % 2.09 ± 0.90
  Others 5 1.9 % 4.07 ± 1.76
 Nuclear grade
  Grade I 67 25.6 % 2.90 ± 1.89
  Grade II 99 37.8 % 2.82 ± 2.48
  Grade III 96 36.6 % 3.92 ± 3.10
 Lymph node metastasis
  Negative 180 68.7 % 3.03 ± 2.60
  Positive 82 31.3 % 3.71 ± 2.66
 Vascular invasion
  Negative 194 74.0 % 3.08 ± 2.55
  Positive 68 26.0 % 3.72 ± 2.84

Two hundred and sixty-two luminal-type patients (luminal A and B) were evaluated in this study