Table 3.
Longitudinal outcomes: Psychodynamic programme versus MBT
Linear mixed model estimates | |||
---|---|---|---|
Baseline (0 months) | Monthly change-rate | Three-year effect size | |
M (SE) | M (SE) | ||
Symptom distress: BSI | |||
Psychodynamic program | 1.9 (0.04) | −0.01 (0.002) | 0.88 |
MBT | 2.1 (0.1) | −0.03 (0.005) | 1.79 |
Difference (psychodynamic program – MBT) | ns | 0.015 (0.004)** | |
Interpersonal problems: CIP | |||
Psychodynamic program | 1.8 (0.03) | −0.01 (0.001) | 0.91 |
MBT | 1.7 (0.08) | −0.02 (0.002) | 1.41 |
Difference (psychodynamic program – MBT) | ns | 0.07 (0.003)** | |
CIP subscale: Mistrust | |||
Psychodynamic program | 2.42 (0.06) | −0.016 (0.002) | 0.67 |
MBT | 2.55 (0.15) | −0.03 (0.006) | 1.46 |
Difference (psychodynamic program – MBT) | ns | 0.01 (0.004)* | |
Psychosocial functioning: GAF | |||
Psychodynamic program | 46 (0.3) | 0.24 (0.02) | 2.97 |
MBT | 48 (0.7) | 0.49 (0.09) | 4.60 |
Difference (psychodynamic program – MBT) | ns | −0.21 (0.05)** |
Note.The table demonstrates mixed model estimations of longitudinal (linear) change and corresponding estimated effect sizes for patients in MBT and in the former psychodynamic treatment program.
MBT = mentalization-based treatment; M = mean; SE = standard error; BSI = Brief Symptom Inventory; CIP = Circumplex of Interpersonal Problems; GAF = global assessment of functioning.
** and *indicates statistically significant at p < .01 and p < .05, respectively. Not significant differences (p > .05) are indicated by ns.