Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Nov 11;115(3):419–425.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.08.029

Table 1.

Demographic Characteristics of Schools Participating in the Minnesota School Health Profiles Survey in 2008, 2010, and 2012

2008 N= 203 N (%) 2010 N=226 N (%) 2012a N = 275 N (%)

Grade Levelb
    Middle School 68 (33.5%) 82 (30.4%) 95 (33.8%)
    Junior/Senior High School 68 (33.5%) 98 (36.8%) 101 (36.7%)
    High School 67 (33%) 87 (32.7%) 83 (30.2%)
School Locationc
    City 28 (13.8%) 38 (14.3%) 26 (9.5%)
    Suburb 39 (19.2%) 49 (18.4%) 47 (17.1%)
    Town/Rural 136 (67%) 179 (67.3%) 202 (73.5%)
Free/Reduced Price Lunch (FRPL) Eligibilityd
    < 20% 57 (28.1%) 51 (19.2%) 50 (18.2%)
    20- <60% 130 (64%) 195 (73.3%) 207 (75.3%)
    ≥ 60% 16 (7.9%) 20 (7.5%) 18 (6.5%)
Minority Enrollmente
    < 5% 70 (34.5%) 79 (29.7%) 67 (24.4%)
    5- <50% 113 (55.7%) 167 (62.8%) 191 (69.5%)
    ≥ 50% 20 (9.9%) 20 (7.5%) 17 (6.2%)
a

Data for school location, minority enrollment and FRPL school level data from 2011

b

Middle School defined as having a low grade of ≥ 5 and a high grade of ≤ 9; Junior/ Senior High School defined as having a low grade of ≤ 8 and a high grade of ≥10; High School defined as having a low grade of ≥9 and a high grade of ≥10

c

Classified according to NCES and Rural-Urban Commuting Areas schemes

d

Percent of students eligible to receive free/reduced price lunch

e

Percent of non-white and/or Hispanic students enrolled at school