Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Kidney Int. 2014 Sep 17;87(3):623–631. doi: 10.1038/ki.2014.298

Table 2.

Characteristics of all PH patients and the PH1 subgroup with or without nephrocalcinosis.

PH PH1

Without NC
(N=156)
With NC
(N=79)
Without NC
(N=101)
With NC
(N=69)
Gender
  Male/Female 86/70 45/34 54/47 39/30
Age, yrs
  at diagnosis 9.3 (4.5, 24.7) 4.4 (1.8, 10.0)* 11.5 (5.6, 30.7) 4.2 (1.9, 9.4)*
  at last follow up 22.7 (10.1, 44.7) 15.4 (5.8, 23.9)* 25.7 (13.2, 44.8) 15.1 (5.8, 22.6)*
Stone events, /yr 0.18 (0.06, 0.47) 0.27 (0.00, 0.52) 0.16 (0.05, 0.45) 0.28 (0.00, 0.59)
Stones per image 2.0 (0.8, 4.0) 3.0 (1.5, 6.1)# 2.6 (1.0, 4.0) 3.8 (1.7, 6.8)#
P[ox], µmol/L 4.6 (2.7, 12.0) 8.7 (3.7, 17.5)# 6.6 (3.0, 15.6) 8.8 (4.1, 17.6)
U[ox], mmol/24ha 1.3 (0.9, 1.9) 2.0 (1.3, 2.6) * 1.3 (0.9, 2.1) 2.0 (1.3, 2.6) *
U[Ca], mg/24ha 90.2 (59.2, 149.2) 63.0 (43.4, 90.9) * 79.2 (51.5, 112.7) 55.6 (39.9, 85.7) *
 U[citrate], mg/24ha 445 (264, 750) 346 (190, 608) 336 (210, 643) 294 (183, 490)
 U[volume], L/24ha 2.4 (1.9, 3.1) 2.8 (2.2, 3.6) 2.4 (1.8, 3.2) 2.8 (2.3, 3.6)

Patients who had ESKD before first image were excluded in the analysis. All plasma and urinary results were the average of all values prior to ESKD. Gender is expressed as number and statistical analysis was made by Chi-Square. The rest are expressed as median (interquartile range) and statistical analysis was made by rank sum test.

a

adjusted by body surface area;

*

P<0.01;

#

P<0.05