Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 22;15:45. doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0385-9

Table 1.

Sample information, sequence abundance and microbial diversity in the naturally fermented cow’s milks

Sample Sampling location Number of reads Number of OTU Shannon index Simpson index Chao1 index Observed species
Bacteria Fungi Bacteria Fungi Bacteria Fungi Bacteria Fungi Bacteria Fungi Bacteria Fungi
E12 Kalmykia 14533 8631 68 21 0.8 1.0 0.2 0.3 93.1 23.8 68.0 21.0
F10 Kalmykia 12367 10087 211 18 3.9 0.5 0.9 0.1 329.0 20.9 210.6 18.0
F2 Kalmykia 15173 8265 168 50 2.5 2.3 0.6 0.7 228.8 98.3 167.8 49.8
F3 Kalmykia 12249 10296 126 31 2.4 0.7 0.6 0.2 193.0 38.4 125.8 30.9
F4 Kalmykia 13465 5854 55 53 1.8 2.5 0.5 0.7 72.2 69.5 54.9 52.9
F6 Kalmykia 18820 8596 29 52 0.5 2.8 0.1 0.7 68.0 61.2 29.0 51.9
F9 Kalmykia 14361 3639 104 56 2.5 2.9 0.7 0.8 141.0 76.1 103.9 55.8
F11 Kalmykia 12640 N.F. 131 N.F. 2.7 N.F. 0.7 N.F. 181.9 N.F. 130.9 N.F.
Ra17 Kalmykia 12215 5545 51 21 1.8 0.4 0.5 0.1 66.0 25.2 51.0 21.0
Mean (Kalmykia samples) 13980.3 ± 2123.5 6768.1 ± 3362.4 104.8 ± 60.1 33.6 ± 19.9 2.1 ± 1.0* 1.5 ± 1.2 0.5 ± 0.3* 0.4 ± 0.3 152.6 ± 89.6* 45.9 ± 31.9 104.7 ± 60.0* 33.5 ± 19.9
D8 Chita 13743 5956 67 17 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 84.4 19.2 66.9 17.0
D9 Chita 13379 6426 87 19 1.6 0.7 0.5 0.2 112.1 54.5 86.9 19.0
D12 Chita 13449 N.F. 38 N.F. 0.2 N.F. 0.0 N.F. 50.9 N.F. 38.0 N.F.
E1 Chita 14114 3886 44 14 0.3 0.7 0.1 0.2 96.5 28.0 44.0 13.9
E2 Chita 12510 6020 28 25 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.2 63.5 32.4 28.0 25.0
E3 Chita 9929 8736 57 33 1.8 1.4 0.5 0.5 80.9 84.8 57.0 33.0
E4 Chita 17494 9768 64 36 1.7 1.5 0.5 0.5 77.1 40.8 63.9 36.0
E5 Chita 17059 1240 54 37 2.1 3.4 0.7 0.9 84.2 48.0 53.9 36.8
ELS10 Chita 16157 9999 56 34 1.2 2.0 0.4 0.6 68.2 72.4 56.0 33.9
ELS20 Chita 7721 556 41 22 1.3 2.5 0.4 0.8 61.9 36.4 41.0 21.2
Mean (Chita samples) 13555.5 ± 3041.0 5258.7 ± 3728.7 53.6 ± 16.9 23.7 ± 11.8 1.1 ± 0.7* 1.3 ± 1.0 0.3 ± 0.2* 0.4 ± 0.3 78.0 ± 17.9* 41.7 ± 24.8 53.6 ± 16.9* 23.6 ± 11.8

‘N.F.’ denotes for ‘not found’. *:p < 0.05 (by Mann-Whitney test) was considered significantly different between the two sample groups.