Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 27;56(2):85–90. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.14-101

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis

Author Year Country Mucosal protective agents Patients number Intervention Duration (days)
Kato 2010 Japan Rebamipide 31
RPZ 10 mg/day
28
31 RPZ + rebamipide 300 mg/day

Fujiwara 2011 Japan Rebamipide 31
OPZ 20 mg/day
56
30 OPZ + rebamipide 300 mg/day

Araki 2012 Japan Rebamipide 42
OPZ 20 mg/day, LPZ 30 mg/day or RPZ 10 mg/day
28
45 PPI + rebamipide 300 mg/day

Kobayashi 2012 Japan Rebamipide 85
OPZ 20 mg/day or LPZ 30 mg/day
28–42
85 PPI + rebamipide 300 mg/day

Shin 2012 Korea Rebamipide 129
Pantprazole 40 mg/day
28
126 Pantprazole + rebamipide 300 mg/day

Takayama 2013 Japan Rebamipide 44
LPZ 30 mg/day
28/56
45 LPZ 30 mg/day, 5 days; then rebamipide 300 mg/day

Asakuma 2009 Japan Ecabet 27
RPZ 20 mg/day
28/56
28 RPZ + ecabet 3 g/day

Hyun 2010 Korea Ecabet 38
LPZ 30 mg/day
28
38 LPZ 30 mg/day, 7 days; then ecabet 3 g/day

Inaba 2010 Japan Polaprezinc 80
LPZ 30 mg/day
56
79 LPZ + polaprezinc 150 mg/day

Yoshida 2013 Japan Polaprezinc 27
OPZ 20 mg/day
56
23 OPZ + polaprezinc 150 mg/day

Miyahara 2013 Japan Irsogladine 45
PPI
28
51 PPI + irsogladine

RPZ: rabeprazole, OPZ: omeprazole, LPZ: lansoprazole.