Table 1.
Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis
Author Year | Country | Mucosal protective agents | Patients number | Intervention | Duration (days) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kato 2010 | Japan | Rebamipide | 31 |
RPZ 10 mg/day |
28 |
31 | RPZ + rebamipide 300 mg/day | ||||
Fujiwara 2011 | Japan | Rebamipide | 31 |
OPZ 20 mg/day |
56 |
30 | OPZ + rebamipide 300 mg/day | ||||
Araki 2012 | Japan | Rebamipide | 42 |
OPZ 20 mg/day, LPZ 30 mg/day or RPZ 10 mg/day |
28 |
45 | PPI + rebamipide 300 mg/day | ||||
Kobayashi 2012 | Japan | Rebamipide | 85 |
OPZ 20 mg/day or LPZ 30 mg/day |
28–42 |
85 | PPI + rebamipide 300 mg/day | ||||
Shin 2012 | Korea | Rebamipide | 129 |
Pantprazole 40 mg/day |
28 |
126 | Pantprazole + rebamipide 300 mg/day | ||||
Takayama 2013 | Japan | Rebamipide | 44 |
LPZ 30 mg/day |
28/56 |
45 | LPZ 30 mg/day, 5 days; then rebamipide 300 mg/day | ||||
Asakuma 2009 | Japan | Ecabet | 27 |
RPZ 20 mg/day |
28/56 |
28 | RPZ + ecabet 3 g/day | ||||
Hyun 2010 | Korea | Ecabet | 38 |
LPZ 30 mg/day |
28 |
38 | LPZ 30 mg/day, 7 days; then ecabet 3 g/day | ||||
Inaba 2010 | Japan | Polaprezinc | 80 |
LPZ 30 mg/day |
56 |
79 | LPZ + polaprezinc 150 mg/day | ||||
Yoshida 2013 | Japan | Polaprezinc | 27 |
OPZ 20 mg/day |
56 |
23 | OPZ + polaprezinc 150 mg/day | ||||
Miyahara 2013 | Japan | Irsogladine | 45 |
PPI |
28 |
51 | PPI + irsogladine |
RPZ: rabeprazole, OPZ: omeprazole, LPZ: lansoprazole.