Skip to main content
. 2004 May 26;2:11. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-2-11

Table 1.

Effect of combining the exonuclease and active site mutations in Pol ε gene on mutation rates in haploids in 8C-YUNI101 genetic background

POL2 allele Mutation rates for different markers*
Forward mutation Reversion

Base substitutions Frameshifts (+1)

Canr (× 10-7) Ura+ × (10-8) His+ × (10-8)

Mismatch repair proficient strains
wild-type 3.3 1.3 1.1
2.5–4.9 1.1–1.7 0.9–3.5
pol2-Y831A 5.1 1.2 1.6
3.5–12.1 0.8–2.8 0.5–2.7
pol2-4 27 3.41 452
15–42 2.4–5.7 35–78
pol2-4,Y831A 9 1.5 3.93
7–15 1.1–1.9 2.3–5.4
Mismatch repair deficient strains (pms1)
wild-type 90 2.8 87
72–150 2.4–4.1 54–150
pol2-Y831A 340 124 4705
230–420 11–19 270–790
pol2-4 760 1606 16007
120–1060 90–420 950–2800
pol2-4,Y831A 270 158 4109
190–440 8–55 260–440

*Here and thereafter, median for 9–27 independent cultures with 95% confidence limits below. 114/16 of revertants sequenced were due to C->A transversions 220/20 revertants sequenced contained a +1A frameshift event 316/16 revertants sequenced were due to +1A frameshift 412/14 revertants were due to C->A change 515/15 revertants sequenced were due to +1A frameshift 612/12 revertants sequenced were due to C->A mutation 716/16 revertants sequenced were due to +1A frameshift 812/15 revertants sequenced were due to C->A mutation 914/14 revertants were due to +1A frameshift