Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 6;12(104):20141225. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.1225

Table 3.

Average accuracy (averaged across all six binary stimuli combinations and all five classifier variants) and best accuracy (averaged across four ‘one versus rest’ stimuli combinations) for classification using individual features.

ranked features scatter matrix average accuracy for all binary stimulus combinations (%) best accuracy for all ‘one versus rest’ stimulus combinations (%)
F1 mean (μ) 0.8453 70.87 73.01, Mahalanobis
F2 wentropy (WE) 0.2858 69.79 62.26, Mahalanobis
F3 Hjorth complexity (cH) 0.1022 66.61 60.82, Mahalanobis
F4 interquartile range (IQR) 0.2838 65.07 63.62, LDA/Diaglinear
F5 variance (σ2) 0.0453 63.57 65.58, LDA/Diaglinear
F6 average spectral power (Inline graphic) 0.1385 60.51 61.58, Mahalanobis
F7 DFA (α) 0.1989 60.14 61.28, Mahalanobis
F8 kurtosis (β) −0.0637 58.06 62.64, Mahalanobis
F9 Hjorth mobility (mH) 0.0064 57.45 61.44, Mahalanobis
F10 skewness (γ) −0.5731 54.55 62.09, Mahalanobis
F11 Hurst exponent (H) 0.0321 52.38 61.40, Mahalanobis