Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb;75(1-2):47–55.

Table 3.

Correlations between each category of locomotive syndrome self-assessment checklist and other variables in the study subjects

Variables LS 1 (n=24) 2 (n=48) 3 (n=19) 4 (n=9) 5 (n=44) 6 (n=21) 7 (n=22)
Age (years) 0.314*** 0.391*** 0.057 0.376*** 0.038 0.163* 0.163* 0.245**
Back muscle strength (kg) –0.308*** –0.286*** –0.125 –0.410*** –0.058 –0.138 –0.205** –0.277***
BMI 0.183* 0.231** 0.037 0.191** 0.050 0.153* 0.104 0.080
Spinal inclination angle (°) 0.207** 0.215** 0.024 0.359*** 0.040 0.063 0.174* 0.185*
Sacral slope angle (°) –0.172* –0.265*** –0.060 –0.290*** –0.074 –0.129 –0.085 –0.159*
Thoracic kyphosis angle (°) 0.110 0.173* 0.182* 0.142 –0.083 0.040 0.098 0.086
Lumbar kyphosis angle (°) 0.122 0.166* –0.041 0.243** 0.096 0.064 0.090 0.100
Thoracic spinal ROM (°) –0.052 –0.032 –0.039 0.018 –0.008 –0.108 0.058 0.109
Lumbar spinal ROM (°) –0.170* –0.266*** –0.079 –0.165* –0.111 –0.092 –0.138 –0.115
Total spinal ROM (°) –0.128 –0.221** 0.000 –0.205** 0.124 –0.009 –0.190** –0.178*

Data represent Spearman’s correlation coefficient (r) *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001

LS: locomotive syndrome, as described by any of the seven categories.