Skip to main content
. 2014;6(6):136–148. doi: 10.1080/17571472.2014.11494365

Table 2.

PCMH implementation in the High Plains Research Network.


Variable Number (%)
n = 37

MD, medical doctor; DO, doctor of osteopathy; NP, nurse practitioner; PA, physician assistant; FTE, full-time equivalent.
Practice type
Federally qualified health centre 10 (27)
Certified rural health clinic 17 (46)
Private practice 6 (16)
Other or unknown 4 (11)
Practice staff
Total MD/DO (average) 1.9
leq 1 21 (57)
2–3 10 (27)
> 3 6 (16)
Total NP/PA (average) 1.4
leq 1 26 (70)
2–3 8 (22)
> 3 3 (8)
Total other staff (average) 8.5
leq 5 19 (51)
6–10 10 (27)
> 10 8 (22)
FTE MD/DO (average) 1.7
FTE NP/PA (average) 1.3
FTE other staff (average) 7.6

PCMH element Implemented (N) Plans or interest to implement (N) No interest to implement (N)

Access 19 3 15
Email 9 20 8
Pre-visit huddle 26 4 7
Post visit 28 7 2
Patient education 28 9 0
Family involvement 23 12 2
Health assessments 35 1 1
Group visits 6 9 22
Electronic health records 30 6 1
Electronic prescibing 28 6 3
Medication reconciliation 32 1 4
Information tracking 32 4 1
Registry 22 9 6
Protocols 34 3 0
Provider prompts/reminders 27 6 4
Safety and quality 31 4 2
Professional information sharing 33 3 1
Medical neighbourhood 11 15 11