Table 2.
Effects of high-grain (HG) feeding on average relative abundance of genus level (% of total sequences) in rumen epithelium, ranked by alphabetical order of first letter of phylum, family and genus name.
| Phylum | Family | Genus | Abundance (%) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hay | HG | ||||
| Actinobacteria | Coriobacteriaceae | Unclassified Coriobacteriaceae | 3.10 ± 0.54 | 0.86 ± 0.22 | 0.008 |
| Bacteroidetes | Prevotellaceae | Prevotella | 4.36 ± 0.79 | 3.66 ± 0.50 | 0.548 |
| Unclassified Prevotellaceae | 5.34 ± 0.39 | 8.30 ± 0.80 | 0.056 | ||
| Rikenellaceae | Unclassified Rikenellaceae | 5.80 ± 0.56 | 3.59 ± 0.50 | 0.016 | |
| Unclassified Bacteroidales | Unclassified Bacteroidales | 5.00 ± 0.25 | 4.02 ± 0.44 | 0.095 | |
| Chloroflexi | Anaerolineaceae | Unclassified Anaerolineaceae | 1.05 ± 0.06 | 2.84 ± 0.53 | 0.008 |
| Firmicutes | Lachnospiraceae | Acetitomaculum | 2.23 ± 0.34 | 1.33 ± 0.29 | 0.095 |
| Butyrivibrio | 4.48 ± 0.43 | 17.55 ± 2.05 | 0.008 | ||
| Howardella | 3.68 ± 0.53 | 1.75 ± 0.23 | 0.008 | ||
| Syntrophococcus | 1.71 ± 0.34 | 1.13 ± 0.08 | 0.151 | ||
| Unclassified Lachnospiraceae | 9.82 ± 0.77 | 9.50 ± 0.78 | 1.000 | ||
| Ruminococcaceae | Ruminococcus | 0.45 ± 0.05 | 2.20 ± 0.52 | 0.008 | |
| Unclassified Ruminococcaceae | 8.36 ± 0.85 | 4.97 ± 0.77 | 0.016 | ||
| Unclassified Clostridiales | Mogibacterium | 3.30 ± 0.37 | 5.36 ± 0.56 | 0.016 | |
| Unclassified Clostridiales | 4.75 ± 0.72 | 7.91 ± 0.85 | 0.032 | ||
| Veillonellaceae | Succiniclasticum | 1.16 ± 0.22 | 3.21 ± 0.35 | 0.008 | |
| Erysipelotrichaceae | Unclassified Erysipelotrichaceae | 5.08 ± 0.46 | 2.76 ± 0.31 | 0.008 | |
| Proteobacteria | Comamonadaceae | Comamonas | 2.59 ± 0.37 | 2.69 ± 0.34 | 1.000 |
| Neisseriaceae | Unclassified Neisseriaceae | 4.57 ± 2.10 | 0.14 ± 0.05 | 0.008 | |
| Desulfobulbaceae | Desulfobulbus | 5.74 ± 1.26 | 5.27 ± 0.63 | 1.000 | |
| Campylobacteraceae | Campylobacter | 2.27 ± 0.23 | 1.96 ± 0.48 | 0.841 | |
| Tenericutes | Unclassified Mollicutes | Unclassified Mollicutes | 2.27 ± 0.21 | 0.30 ± 0.07 | 0.008 |
Only results obtained for the predominant bacterial genera (relative abundance >1% in at least one sample) are presented. Values shown are means ± SEM, n = 5.