Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar;142:24–35. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.01.002

Table 1.

ANOVA results for the ROI analysis.

Location Task
Difficulty
Interaction
F Sig. Effect size (eta2) F Sig. Effect size (eta2) F Sig. Effect size (eta2)
Action ROIs
Left precentral gyrus 2.01 .175 .120 10.13 .006 .380 .693 .417 .040
Left SMG 5.81 .028 .270 4.22 .057 .210 .805 .383 .050
Left pMTG 6.18 .024 .280 9.22 .008 .360 1.10 .309 .070



Visual ROIs
Left fusiform gyrus .265 .614 .010 33.68 <.001 .690 1.49 .240 .080
Right fusiform gyrus .537 .474 .030 4.85 .048 .220 3.35 .086 .170



Control ROIs
Left IFG (BA 44) 2.42 .139 .132 53.58 <.001 .770 .000 .984 .000
Left IFG (BA 47) 3.45 .082 .117 21.11 <.001 .559 1.59 .225 .091
Left medial PFC 1.59 .226 .090 46.97 <.001 .750 .629 .439 .040
Left IPS/dorsal AG 12.80 .003 .450 3.02 .101 .160 19.06 <.001 .540
Left pMTG 6.71 .020 .300 8.69 .009 .350 1.59 .226 .090
Right IFG (BA 44) .191 .668 .012 3.12 .096 .163 .001 .976 .000

Table reports results for 2 × 2 repeated measures ANOVAs examining the effects of task (visual vs. action feature selection) and difficulty (easy vs. hard) plus their interaction. All significant effects are reported in bold text.