Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Depress Anxiety. 2014 Nov 25;32(3):174–181. doi: 10.1002/da.22332

Table 3.

Descriptive and Inferential statistics for the CBT and TAU Conditions.

Measure Baseline Post-treatment Follow-up

CBT
M (SD)
TAU
M (SD)
CBT
M (SD)
TAU
M (SD)
tx dx CBT
M (SD)
ty dy tz dz
PARS 15.81 (1.64) 15.67 (2.50) 10.94 (3.91) 13.93 (3.56) 2.21* 0.79 9.78 (3.38) −0.38 −0.13 6.15** 2.05
ADIS CSRa 5.50 (1.03) 5.73 (0.80) 3.69 (1.35) 5.33 (0.90) 3.84** 1.30 2.47 (2.31) 1.08 0.39 4.01** 1.44
CGI-Severity 3.69 (0.60) 3.93 (0.80) 2.88 (0.72) 3.67 (0.82) 2.68* 0.94 2.67 (0.50) 0.00 0.00 5.55** 1.85
SRS
 Awareness 12.50 (3.60) 14.47 (3.14) 10.00 (3.29) 13.27 (3.06) 2.31* 0.75 8.11 (2.09) 1.81 0.60 3.90** 1.30
 Cognition 19.06 (5.87) 20.67 (5.64) 14.69 (5.40) 19.80 (5.35) 2.77** 0.76 10.89 (4.43) 4.66** 1.55 8.40** 2.80
 Communication 38.06 (8.57) 38.13 (9.44) 27.13 (8.52) 36.67 (9.20) 3.75** 1.13 19.78 (5.04) 3.57** 1.19 6.49** 2.16
 Motivation 18.19 (5.90) 18.33 (5.59) 15.13 (6.62) 17.53 (6.60) 1.28 0.35 10.11 (3.37) 3.38** 1.13 3.63** 1.21
 Mannerisms 18.13 (5.98) 21.33 (6.07) 14.00 (8.22) 20.13 (5.99) 1.76 0.52 7.78 (3.93) 4.18** 1.39 8.37** 2.79
 Total 105.94 (22.64) 112.93 (24.77) 80.94 (26.83) 107.40 (24.53) 2.80** 0.84 56.67 (12.95) 5.68** 1.89 9.36** 3.12
RCADS 27.94 (15.42) 27.05 (20.86) 23.86 (15.24) 21.88 (17.19) −0.30 −0.09 23.12 (16.44) −0.83 −0.30 1.54 0.52
MASC-P 62.33 (19.99) 64.37 (11.56) 56.94 (17.52) 58.62 (17.56) 0.10 0.03 45.89 (19.69) 1.12 0.44 1.23 0.44
CIS-P 23.52 (7.51) 25.67 (7.45) 17.24 (9.75) 24.96 (8.91) 2.58* 0.59 18.00 (7.31) −0.97 −0.32 2.46* 0.86
CBCL
 Internalizing 28.12 (11.27) 23.55 (8.16) 18.79 (8.73) 20.07 (6.89) 1.94 0.48 17.33 (10.78) −0.71 −0.24 3.11* 1.11
 Externalizing 15.63 (10.03) 15.70 (11.09) 10.79 (8.48) 15.92 (10.88) 3.28** 0.63 8.98 (6.77) −0.98 −0.40 1.48 0.56

Note.

**

p<.01;

*

p<.05

a

Clinical severity rating associated with principal diagnosis

x

Post-treatment analyses evaluated the effect of treatment condition while accounting for baseline group differences

y

Analyses compare 1-month follow-up to post-treatment status for treatment responders who returned for a follow-up assessment

z

Analyses compare 1-month follow-up to baseline status for treatment responders who returned for a follow-up assessment.