Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2015 Jan 14;80:126–135. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2014.12.024

Table 2.

Spontaneous Ca2+ wave Characteristics

decay time (ms) velocity (um/sec) frequency (Hz) ΔF/Fo
Free
[Ca2+]
(nM)
Baseline Fab Fab +
cAMP
Baseline Fab Fab +
cAMP
Baseline Fab Fab +
cAMP
Baseline Fab Fab +
cAMP
100 -- 44±6* 47±8^ -- 133±21* 138±25^ -- 0.44±0.16* 0.46±0.13^ -- 4.68±0.54* 4.84±0.69^
200 -- 45±7* 46±9^ -- 140±26* 142±20^ -- 1.05±0.21* 1.07±0.21^ -- 4.49±0.63* 4.45±0.57^
400 89±14 52±8* 53±9^ 112±26 144±13* 146±21^ 1.12±0.38 1.61±0.55* 1.76±0.62^ 2.89±0.31 4.41±0.41* 4.38±0.38^
500 74±12 54±4* 52±8^ 123±10 143±23* 150±25^ 2.38±0.11 2.82±0.24* 2.76±0.16^ 2.39±0.51 2.91±1.02 2.88±0.71
1000 61±9 60±8 60±9 157±23 156±24 157±24 2.90±0.11 2.95±0.12 2.93±0.14 2.33±0.38 2.38±0.32 2.41±0.34

Spontaneous Ca2+ wave (SCWs) were measured in permeabilized VMs at various free [Ca2+] as indicated in Figure 5. SCWs characteristics at baseline, after Fab (100µg/ml), and after cAMP (20µM) are reported. SCWs Ca2+ decay time, velocity, frequency, and ΔF/F0 were compared using one way ANOVA (12 cells from 4 mice were chosen for comparison in each free [Ca2+], * baseline vs Fab P < 0.05, ^ baseline vs Fab+cAMP P < 0.05). Data are mean±SEM.