Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am Heart J. 2015 Jan 6;169(3):323–333. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.12.009

Table 2.

Torsemide vs. Furosemide studies: Hospitalizations and mortality

Study
(Year)
N Patients Design Average
Follow-up
Comparison Outcomes
(Torsemide vs
Furosemide)
Limitations
TORIC (2002) 1377
  • Spanish-based

  • Avg. age ~68 years

  • NYHA class II-IV

  • 50% female

Open-label, non-randomized, post-marketing surveillance 9.2 months
(~276 days)
Torsemide avg. dose
8.2 mg/day
Vs.
Furosemide avg. dose
35 mg/day + other
diuretics
  • 51.5% RR reduction in total mortality (17 vs. 27 deaths)

  • 59.7% RR reduction in cardiac mortality (11 vs. 27 deaths)

  • Greater improvement in ≥ 1 NYHA class

  • Non-randomized

  • Greater concurrent use of other diuretics in furosemide group

  • Low use of standard HF therapies

  • Rural non-hospital based population

  • No report of hospitalization rates

Müller
et al.
(2003)
237
  • Switzerland-based

  • Avg. age ~74 years

  • NYHA class II-IV

  • Required ACE inhibitor use

  • ~57% female

Open-label,
randomized,
prospective
239 days in
Torsemide arm

250 days in
Furosemide arm
Torsemide avg. dose
11.36 mg/day
Vs.
Furosemide avg. dose
40.04 mg/day
  • No difference in mortality (8 vs. 6 deaths)

  • No difference in number of HF and CV-disease hospitalizations (10 vs. 11)

  • Fewer combined HF and CV-related hospital days (95 vs. 146)

  • Greater improvement in ≥ 1 NYHA class

  • Small sample size

  • Sample sizes in each group were not adequately powered

  • Furosemide group had more renal insufficiency

  • Concurrent ACE inhibitor therapy was required

  • Hospitalization data skewed by a single furosemide-treated patient with prolonged hospital stay

  • Lack of blinding and subjective data

Murray
et al. (2001)
234
  • Indianapolis, USA-based

  • Avg. age ~64 years

  • NYHA class II-III

  • Excluded LV diastolic dysfunction only

  • ~53% female

Open-label,
randomized,
prospective
324 days in
Torsemide arm

318 days in
Furosemide arm
Torsemide avg. dose
72 mg/day
Vs.
Furosemide avg. dose
136 mg/day
  • No difference in mortality

  • 52% decrease in HF readmission rate

  • 34% decrease in all CV-related readmission risk

  • Less HF-related hospital days (106 vs. 296)

  • Small sample size

  • Torsemide group had more pre-trial HF hospitalizations in prior 1 year

  • High reported daily doses of loop diuretics

Abbreviations: ACE: Angiotensin converting enzyme; avg: average; CV: cardiovascular; HF: heart failure; LV: left ventricular; mg: milligram; NYHA: New York Heart Association; RR: relative risk