Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 3;5:8649. doi: 10.1038/srep08649

Table 4. Relationship Between TTF-1 Expression and Clinicopathological Parameters in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

          TTF-1 Expression
Clinicopathological Parameters Total Positive (n = 161) Negative (n = 37) P Value
Age, y        
 <65 y 109 92 (84.4) 17 (15.6) 0.2170
 ≥65 y 89 69 (77.5) 20 (22.5)  
Gender        
 Male 108 83 (76.9) 25 (23.1) 0.0777
 Female 90 78 (86.7) 12 (13.3)  
Smoking habit        
 No 93 84 (90.3) 9 (9.7) 0.0025
 Yes 105 77 (73.3) 28 (26.7)  
Tumor size        
 ≤5 cm 181 154 (85.1) 27 (14.9) <0.0001
 >5 cm 17 7 (41.2) 10 (58.8)  
Tumor differentiation        
 Well/moderately 168 143 (85.1) 25 (14.9) 0.0011
 Poorly 30 18 (60.0) 12 (30.0)  
p-TNM stage*        
 Stage I 130 113 (86.9) 17 (13.1) 0.0051
 Stage II/III 68 48 (70.6) 20 (29.4)  
Nodal status        
 N0 152 121 (79.6) 31 (20.4) 0.2624
 N1/N2/N3 46 40 (87.0) 6 (13.0)  
Vascular invasion        
 No 106 89 (84.0) 17 (16.0) 0.4715
 Yes 69 55 (79.7) 14 (20.3)  
Lymphatic invasion        
 No 101 83 (82.2) 18 (17.8) 0.5999
 Yes 55 47 (85.5) 8 (14.5)  
Pleural invasion        
 No 136 115 (84.6) 21 (15.4) 0.0827
 Yes 62 46 (74.2) 16 (25.8)  
Adjuvant chemotherapy        
 No 168 135 (80.4) 33 (19.6) 0.4141
 Yes 30 26 (86.7) 4 (13.3)  

Data are presented as positive rate and average staining score. See Table 1 legend for expansion of abbreviations.

*Each case was reassigned for pathological stage according to the 7th edition of TNM classification[30, 31].