Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 26;16(2):2732–2746. doi: 10.3390/ijms16022732

Table 2.

Genotype distribution of the SNPs and their associations with the risk of CHF under different contrast models.

Genotype Controls n (%) CHF n (%) HWE p a Dominant Model p a Recessive Model p a Additive Model p a Allele Contrast p a
rs2236624 0.752 0.842 0.223 0.390 0.381
TT (W) 33 (8.27) 26 (8.70)
CT 159 (39.85) 104 (34.78)
CC 207 (51.88) 169 (56.52)
rs2236625 0.319 0.699 0.443 0.433 0.932
CC (W) 312 (78.39) 238 (79.60)
CT 83 (20.85) 56 (18.73)
TT 3 (0.75) 5 (1.67)
rs4822489 0.219 0.450 0.729 0.609 0.814
TT (W) 98 (24.69) 66 (22.22)
GT 186 (46.85) 150 (50.51)
GG 113 (28.46) 81 (27.27)
rs5751876 0.996 0.818 0.445 0.650 0.725
TT (W) 90 (22.67) 70 (23.41)
CT 198 (49.87) 139 (46.49)
CC 109 (27.46) 90 (30.10)
rs7208480 <0.001 0.283 0.555 0.760 0.322
CC (W) 197 (49.25) 135 (45.15)
CT 195 (48.75) 156 (52.17)
TT 8 (2.00) 8 (2.68)

Abbreviations: CHF, chronic heart failure; HWE, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. a p values were calculated from a two-sided χ2-test.