Table 1. Performance of Three Readers for Characterization of Breast Lesions at DBT and US.
Az Value | Sensitivity* (%) | Specificity* (%) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBT | US | 95% CI† | P | DBT | US | P | DBT | US | P | |
Reader 1 | 0.896 | 0.935 | -0.014, 0.094 | 0.150 | 98.7 (74/75) | 100 (75/75) | 1.000 | 36.4 (16/44) | 43.2 (19/44) | 0.581 |
Reader 2 | 0.917 | 0.905 | -0.038, 0.062 | 0.648 | 100 (75/75) | 98.7 (74/75) | 1.000 | 25.0 (11/44) | 31.8 (14/44) | 0.549 |
Reader 3 | 0.932 | 0.911 | -0.036, 0.077 | 0.480 | 93.3 (70/75) | 97.3 (73/75) | 0.453 | 72.7 (32/44) | 43.2 (19/44) | 0.004 |
Overall | 0.899 | 0.914 | -0.019, 0.049 | 0.394 | 97.3 | 98.7 | 0.508 | 44.7 | 39.4 | 0.360 |
Note.- *Data in parentheses were used to calculated percentages. Optimal cut-off, between Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 and 4A was used to yield maximal sum of sensitivity and specificity in both modality, †CI = confidence interval for difference between DBT and US. DBT = digital breast tomosynthesis, US = ultrasound