Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 27;16(2):402–409. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.2.402

Table 5. Diagnostic Index of Ultrasonography in Detection of Thyroid Pyramidal Lobes According to Radiologists.

Institutions Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) PPV (95% CI) NPV (95% CI) AUC (95% CI)
Experienced
 A (n = 100) 79.7 (67.2-89.0) 82.9 (67.9-92.9) 87.0 (75.1-94.6) 73.9 (58.9-85.7) 0.81 (0.72-0.88)
 B (n = 100) 78.0 (65.3-87.7) 97.6 (87.2-99.9) 97.9 (88.8-99.9) 75.5 (61.7-86.2) 0.88 (0.80-0.94)
 C (n = 100) 94.4 (81.3-99.3) 100 (94.4-100.0) 100 (89.7-100) 97.0 (89.5-99.6) 0.97 (0.92-0.99)
 D (n = 100) 58.3 (44.9-70.9) 95.0 (83.1-99.4) 94.6 (81.8-99.3) 60.3 (47.2-72.4) 0.77 (0.67-0.85)
Less experienced
 E (n = 100) 66.7 (51.0-80.0) 74.6 (61.0-85.3) 68.2 (52.4-81.4) 73.2 (59.7-84.2) 0.71 (0.61-0.79)
 F (n = 82) 58.6 (38.9-76.5) 96.2 (87.0-99.5) 89.5 (66.9-98.7) 81.0 (69.1-89.7) 0.77 (0.67-0.86)

Note.- There was significant difference of diagnostic indices between all institutions by receiver operating characteristic analysis using CT result as reference standard (p < 0.001). AUC = area under curve, CI = confidence interval, NPV = negative predictive value, PPV = positive predictive value