Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 4;92(2):415–421. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0303

Table 1.

Anopheles gambiae s.l. catch numbers per night and species composition of the Infoscitex tent compared with reference methods

Location Method Trap nights Mean no. An. gambiae s.l. caught (95% CI) Total % Of Ref. method P value* Proportion An. gambiae s.s (no. tested) P value
Kedougou, Senegal IST 16 8.44 (5.51–11.37) 135 613.67% 0.0005 1.000 (69) 1.000
LTC 16 1.38 (0.51–2.24) 22 1.000 (16)
Bolahun, Liberia IST 14 11.30 (7.32–15.29) 211 38.03% 0.0203 1.000 (86) 1.000
HLC 14 29.71 (17.23–42.20) 416 1.000 (140)
Bougouriba, Burkina Faso IST 8 52.38 (21.23–83.52) 419 52.91% 0.0391 0.965 (141) 0.070
HLC 8 99.00 (56.00–142.0) 792 1.000 (109)
Diarkadougou, Burkina Faso IST 9 57.56 (15.53–99.58) 518 71.56% 0.1289 1.000 (142) 0.228
HLC 9 80.44 (30.89–130.0) 724 0.985 (130)
*

P values are calculated by Wilcoxon signed-rank test comparing nightly catch numbers for each method.

P values for proportion An. gambiae s.s. calculated by two-tailed Fisher's exact. “−” = not applicable as it is the reference method.

Mean IST catch values from Liberia were reduced by 0.25× to compare with the 45-minute HLC sampling duration for each hour of the testing.

IST = Infoscitex tent; LTC = light trap catches; HLC = human landing catches.