Skip to main content
. 2009 Nov 11;298(1):F95–F102. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00487.2009

Table 4.

Citrulline uptake by the proximal tubule via filtration vs. peritubular transport

Sham (n = 7) 1–2 Wk (n = 11) 4–5 Wk (n = 7) 10–12 Wk (n = 17)
Renal uptake, nmol/min 66±7 91±11* 32±16* 26±5*
Filtered, nmol/min 50±4 28±4* 16±3 11±2
Peritubular uptake, nmol/min 11±8 55±16* 17±15 7±5
% Filtered uptake 89±10 36±10 71±13 65±15

Values are means ± SE. n = No. of rats. Filtered citrulline was calculated by citrulline delivery multiplied by filtration fraction. Peritubular uptake was calculated by total renal citrulline uptake subtracted from filtered citrulline minus excreted citrulline. Statistics comparing each injury group with sham were done with one-way ANOVA.

*

P < 0.05,

P < 0.01 vs. sham.