Table 4.
Simulation results: effect of policy changes on quality of admitted students.
| Admitted under | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proxy-based affirmative action with weight on predicted likelihood of being a URM |
||||||||
| Traditional affirmative action |
Passive affirmative action ban |
0.1 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 2.6 | |
| URM’s share of admitted students | 19.5% | 16.2% | 16.3% | 17.0% | 17.7% | 18.4% | 19.0% | 19.6% |
| Predicted cumulative GPA in UT classes | 2.944 | 2.951 | 2.951 | 2.947 | 2.943 | 2.938 | 2.934 | 2.929 |
| Predicted likelihood of graduating from UT within six years | 74.9% | 75.1% | 75.1% | 75.0% | 74.8% | 74.7% | 74.5% | 74.4% |