. 2015 Feb 23;9:379–392. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S75812

Table 3.

Accuracy comparison between ASA and Triple-A profiles

Parameter	Time points	ASA (n=107 eyes)	Triple-A (n=79 eyes)	P-value
% with SE within ±0.5 D (%)	1 mo	93	90	0.4215^a
	3 mo	94	92	0.7641^a
	6 mo	89	90	1.0000^a
	1 yr	85	90	0.3820^a
% with SE within ±1.0 D (%)	1 mo	97	100	0.2630^a
	3 mo	99	100	1.0000^a
	6 mo	99	100	1.0000^a
	1 yr	97	100	0.2630^a
				P (mean)	P (variance)
Postoperative SE – target (mean ± SD)	1 mo	0.11±0.40 D	0.10±0.32 D	0.731^b	0.784^c
	3 mo	0.04±0.36 D	0.03±0.33 D	0.760^b	0.427^c
	6 mo	−0.05±0.41 D	−0.01±0.34 D	0.591^b	0.062^c
	1 yr	−0.09±0.46 D	−0.03±0.32 D	0.518^d	0.007^c

Notes:

Statistical analysis between the Triple-A and ASA groups was performed using Fisher’s exact test

two-sided Wilcoxon two-sample test

two-sided Siegel–Tukey test

two-sided median two-sample test.

Abbreviations: ASA, aberration smart ablation; SE, spherical equivalent; SD, standard deviation.