Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 18;2015:492150. doi: 10.1155/2015/492150

Table 2.

Demographics of all subjects and each subgroup in the artificial tear and acupuncture groups.

Subgroups N (eyes) N (subjects) Age, mean (y) Male-to-female ratio Duration of dry eye, (m)
All subjects
 Artificial tear group 102 52 46 0.44 16
 Acupuncture group 86 44 45 0.63 18
P value 0.9650 0.6544 0.9130
LTD
 Artificial tear group 19 10 36 0.43 10
 Acupuncture group 17 9 41 0.80 12
P value 0.8412 0.0276 0.8975
SSDE
 Artificial tear group 18 9 49 0.00 32
 Acupuncture group 18 9 44 0.29 30
P value 0.7651 0.0385 0.9140
Non-SSDE
 Artificial tear group 65 33 47 0.65 13
 Acupuncture group 51 26 46 0.73 16
P value 0.9365 0.6801 0.7732

LTD = lipid tear deficiency; SSDE = Sjögren syndrome dry eye; Non-SSDE = non-Sjögren syndrome dry eye. P values (<0.05) indicate the statistically significant differences between the acupuncture and artificial tear group. Four patients (2 in the acupuncture group and 2 in the control group) were enrolled with only one eye for the reason that one of their eyes had been lost because of eye trauma.