Table 1.
Summary of traits that differ between the two study species.
Traits | Z. nevadensis | M. natalensis |
---|---|---|
Social complexity | Less complex | Highly complex |
Life type | Wood-dwelling single-piece nester | Foraging multiple-piece nester |
Developmental plasticity | Totipotent workers and a single linear developmental pathway | Restricted developmental options for both workers and reproductives; bifurcated development |
Food and digestion | Decaying wood, digested with the help of protists and bacterial gut symbionts | Dead plant material (incl. wood), which is primarily decomposed by symbiotic Termitomyces fungi, with additional roles of gut bacteria |
Potential pathogen load | Predicted to be high, mainly because the logs inhabited by dampwood termites also harbor many wood-decaying fungi | Predicted to be high, with sources being mainly soil microbes and wood-decaying fungi carried to the nest with the substrate particles |
Geographic distribution | Temperate | Tropical and sub-tropical |
Traits 1–3 co-vary in termites in that wood-dwelling termites with totipotent workers are always less socially complex, while foraging termites are more socially complex with workers having restricted developmental options. However, huge trait variability exists within foraging species, see also Figure 1.