Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Res Adolesc. 2014 Feb 5;25(1):173–188. doi: 10.1111/jora.12106

Table 3.

Relationships Between Perceived Prejudice and Adolescents’ Outcomes

Grades in School
ß (SE)
School Attachment
ß (SE)
Step 1
 Schoolwide perceived prejudice (proportion) −.34 (.12)** −.22 (.13)
 Wave 1 outcome .61 (.01)*** .53 (.01)***
 Age −.00 (.02) −.02 (.02)
 Highest parent education .05 (.01)*** .03 (.01)
 Two biological parent family .03 (.01)* .03 (.01)**
 Female .07 (.01)*** −.03 (.01)*
 Latino −.05 (.02)** −.03 (.02)
 African American −.06 (.01)*** −.04 (.02)*
 Asian American .03 (.01) −.00 (.01)
 Other race/ethnicity −.02 (.01) −.02 (.02)
 Immigrant status .01 (.02) .03 (.02)
 Same-sex attraction −.02 (.02) −.02 (.01)
 Overweight −.00 (.01) .01 (.01)
 Socioeconomic advantage −.01 (.01) .02 (.02)
 Private school .06 (.11) .11 (.11)
 High school .29 (.14)* −.03 (.13)
 Enrollment −.10 (.14) −.33 (.14)*
 Percent minority students −.26 (.16) −.05 (.18)
 Percent immigrant students .10 (.16) −.06 (.17)
 Percent sexual minority students .14 (.19) .05 (.11)
 Percent overweight students −.01 (.18) .40 (.12)***
 Percent disadvantaged students −.15 (.22) −.27 (.19)
Step 2
 Schoolwide perceived prejudice (proportion) −.33 (.13)** −.12 (.13)
 Student-level perceived prejudice .01 (.01) −.06 (.02)***
Step 3
 Schoolwide perceived prejudice (proportion) −.33 (.24) .03 (.30)
 Student-level perceived prejudice .02 (.04) −.04 (.05)
 School × student prejudice interaction −.01 (.05) −.04 (.07)

Note. N = 9,765. Results based on pooled estimates across 20 imputed datasets. Effects of markers of vulnerability to stigmatization, prior measures of outcomes, and individual- and school-level controls included in each step; due to space constraints, coefficients only presented for Step 1 (coefficients rather stable over time).

***

p < .001.

**

p < .01.

*

p < .05.